Officials: "A legitimate effort and progressive"
LE FIGARO – The backbone of "retirement" is specific to staff align their contribution rate over that of private sector employees. Why?
Georges Tron – We want a clear and equitable reform. Nothing justifies to contribute three points behind, having comparable pensions. This represents an increase of 6 euros of contributions, on an average salary of 2000 euros a month for ten years.
The calculation of the pension on the last six months of salary, instead of twenty-five best years, is also a symbol of inequity for the opinion …
Wrongly so, if you look calmly at things! We are in a very specific body, grades, levels, indices, with premiums that are excluded from the calculation of the pension.The only question worth asking is: these rules they generate large differences in pay and pensions? The answer is no.
Why have kept "active groups" instead of applying to civil servants the opportunity to retire early for hardship, which will soon be applied in the private sector?
Occupations in uniform (police, firefighters, prison guards …) can effectively retire at 50 or 55 years. It is an old way to take into account how hard these jobs, which nobody denies. The classes are kept active but these floors will be carried over age two years, as for everyone.
You open next Friday, a salary negotiation. Bercy pushes you to a freezing point index.The 0.5% increase for July 1, promised two years ago by Éric Woerth, Will it be good?
While it is important to keep its commitments, we must be lucid about the state of public accounts. This first session will assess the progress of the purchasing power of workers in 2009 and expected for 2010. Based on this diagnosis, I hope shared with the unions, we will be open to discussion. One thing is certain: the issue of pensions is, Eric Woerth and I disconnected from that of wages. There is no question of compensating the first by the second. This would immediately cancel the legitimate efforts and gradual asked officials on pensions, that nobody would understand.
ALSO READ:
"Retirement at age 62: the project is on the table
"Pensions: a majority of French opposed the reform
- Retirement at 67: Fillon sows troubleraites
- Pensions: what the unions are still hoping to wrest the Senate
- In Britain, the public sector scrolls against retirement at age 66
- The Senate voted to postpone the legal age to 62 years
- Pensions: Unions prepare for confrontation